Multidays.com Logo

Multidays.com     WWW  

Multidays.com

Ultra News Links

Planet UltraMarathon
World Ultra News
Ultrarunning World
Ultra Adventures Ultrablog
Ultradistance.za
Ultradistans.se
Ultrafondus
Ultraloper
UltraNed
Ultramarathon News
Ultrarunner.co.uk
Norwegian Ultras
Slovakian Ultras
Spanish Ultra World AUA
DUV
I.A.U.
A.U.R.A.(Wiki)
A.U.R.A.(New)
The Ultralist
Sri Chinmoy Races

Current Events

Across The Years

Upcoming Events

Recent Events

  • Recent Comments:

  • Recent Trackbacks:


  • December 2006
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
  • Events
    • No events.
  • Multiday and Ultrarunning News From Around The World

    Equipment - Waterproof Socks

    December 16, 2006 at 7:55 am

    by Abichal in Clothing, Footcare

    Posted on the Ultralist:

    —– Original Message —–
    From: “Steve Tanio”
    To:
    Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 7:08 PM
    Subject: waterproof socks

    I usually wear Injinji socks when running, and have had much success with no
    blisters and comfort….does anyone who runs trails where water is
    encountered wear a waterproof sock, similar to what duck hunters wear. If
    so, would you wear these over your normal socks…or until Injinji makes a
    waterproof crew sock….

    Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:51:40 -0800
    From: SteveLoitz
    Subject: Re: waterproof socks

    Steve,

    I’ve used three differen socks claimed to be “waterproof” — neoprene, Seal
    Skinz & GoreTex — and I’ve used all three both in running shoes and
    mountaineering boots in cold conditions. I usually wear the neoprene socks
    with no liners, the Seal Skinz with or w/o liners and the GT with liners.
    All three have worked well, although the GT and Seal Skinz are not really
    “waterproof” by my definition of the word. The neoprene socks work much
    more like vapor barrier, so I’d recommend heavily smearing your feet with
    anti-perspirant before use. There’s some exchange of water from the outside
    in the GT and Seal Skinz, but they both help keep my footies warm.

    I suggest that you experiment with them. Except for a tight-fitted neopreme
    sock, expect waterproof socks to take up more volume than your regular
    running socks.

    Steve Loitz
    Seattle

    Dot Helm Wrote:

    My experience is similar to Steve Loitz’s, but I’ve only tested neoprene
    socks and Sealskinz (an early version from about 5 yr ago, they’ve made
    changes) to any extent. (I’ve had goretex and stormproof, if I remember the
    name correctly, but the models I had were too tight across instep of my
    high volume foot.)

    I used a liner sock under neoprene socks in the cold (0F), windy (30-70mph,
    depending on the day), but dry, weather we had about a month ago. That
    worked reasonably well for me for 1 hr runs - much better than my heavy
    smartwools with liners and took up less space in my shoe, so I could still
    wiggle my toes (circulation is always good), although toes were a little
    longer.

    I’ve also used them and sealskinz in warm spring snows successfully. Since
    the sealskinz are thinner, I’ll wear a light weight sock (somewhere between
    liner weight and my lightest normal sock) under them for some cushioning. I
    tried the sealskinz in some wet, warm weather in prep for a race, and I had
    problems with sweaty feet within 1 hr, so wasn’t a viable solution for a 4+
    hr summer race for me.

    I can’t remember for sure under what conditions, but I have had both of
    them either wet through or be sweaty from within if out for enough hours in
    wet enough conditions. But they do delay the inevitable, it seems, and it
    won’t be as wet as without them.

    Leave a reply